LOZADA’s CASE:
Is it right for Lozada to whistle-blow? Justify your answer using the de georges criteria.
No it isn’t. Based on the de georges criterias, he hasn’t met the first 3 criteria’s, the 3rd one which is “… have received no satisfaction from their immediate supervisors…” was not satisfied as they have received a lot already and that they are not being trampled and being underpaid. Another thing was that, documentation is not present or being created stating how it will harm the public and what are the other possibilities that this certain action can harm a lot of people. If all of the criteria’s are being met then it will be okay for Lozada to do the whistle-blowing but then it hasn’t.
Comments (0)
You don't have permission to comment on this page.